1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1967 Ford Fairlane is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 140 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Fairlane | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3930 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |
