1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 1982 Renault 9 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 460 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 1982 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Fairlane | 9 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3930 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2490 mm |
