1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1982 Zastava 750
To start off, 1982 Zastava 750 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 670 kg more than 1982 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 1982 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Fairlane | 750 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 3930 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2010 mm |
