1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1983 Jeep CJ is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (202 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 168 kg more than 1983 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Fairlane | CJ |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6392 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1458 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2380 mm |
