1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1989 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1989 Toyota Cressida is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1989 Toyota Cressida. (123 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1989 Toyota Cressida. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 173 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 1989 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Fairlane | Cressida |
Year Released | 1967 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 1577 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2670 mm |