1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1990 Nissan Presea
To start off, 1990 Nissan Presea is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1990 Nissan Presea. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1990 Nissan Presea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 354 kg more than 1990 Nissan Presea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Nissan Presea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 1990 Nissan Presea | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Fairlane | Presea |
Year Released | 1967 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1838 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2510 mm |