1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1991 Renault Clio

To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (202 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (80 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 608 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications: