1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 1995 Nissan AA-X is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 50 kg more than 1995 Nissan AA-X.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan AA-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Fairlane | AA-X |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3930 cc | 1273 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1260 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2530 mm |
