1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1996 Ford Ka
To start off, 1996 Ford Ka is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ka. (58 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 402 kg more than 1996 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 1996 Ford Ka | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Fairlane | Ka |
Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3930 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 908 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 42 L |