1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 526 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Fairlane | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3930 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1836 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2730 mm |
