1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1998 Ford Telstar
To start off, 1998 Ford Telstar is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (202 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1998 Ford Telstar. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 183 kg more than 1998 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 1998 Ford Telstar | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Fairlane | Telstar |
Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6392 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1458 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |