1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1998 Honda Integra
To start off, 1998 Honda Integra is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Honda Integra (176 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (122 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 111 kg more than 1998 Honda Integra.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 1998 Honda Integra | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Fairlane | Integra |
Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3930 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4525 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1325 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2620 mm |