1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 7,410 cc (12 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E (612 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 490 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 740 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 1998 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Fairlane | E |
Year Released | 1967 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3930 cc | 7410 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 612 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 2050 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 75 L |