1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1999 Fiat Siena
To start off, 1999 Fiat Siena is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1999 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1999 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 10 kg more than 1999 Fiat Siena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 1999 Fiat Siena | |
| Make | Ford | Fiat |
| Model | Fairlane | Siena |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3930 cc | 1910 cc |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1300 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |
