1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 1999 Renault Scenic
To start off, 1999 Renault Scenic is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1999 Renault Scenic. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Scenic weights approximately 175 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1999 Renault Scenic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Scenic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 1999 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Fairlane | Scenic |
Year Released | 1967 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3930 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |