1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Honda Life
To start off, 2000 Honda Life is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2000 Honda Life. (47 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda Life. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 614 kg more than 2000 Honda Life. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Honda Life is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Life will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Honda Life | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Fairlane | Life |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 656 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2370 mm |
