1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2001 Mazda B4000
To start off, 2001 Mazda B4000 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda B4000 (207 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (202 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 113 kg more than 2001 Mazda B4000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 2001 Mazda B4000 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Fairlane | B4000 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6392 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1458 kg | 1345 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 58 L |
