1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 595 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 2001 Mitsubishi SUW | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Fairlane | SUW |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3930 cc | 1097 cc |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 71 L |
