1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 176 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 2002 Acura CL | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | Fairlane | CL |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 3210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2580 mm |
