1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo XC90 (197 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 47 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Fairlane | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2519 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2860 mm |
