1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2003 Honda Z
To start off, 2003 Honda Z is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2003 Honda Z. (51 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 350 kg more than 2003 Honda Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Honda Z is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Z will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 2003 Honda Z | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Fairlane | Z |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3930 cc | 654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 35 L |