1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2003 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2003 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 2003 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fairlane | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3930 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 61 L |