1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Mazda MX | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fairlane | MX |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2760 mm |