1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2004 Toyota Corolla is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (202 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Corolla. (194 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Corolla. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 518 kg more than 2004 Toyota Corolla. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Fairlane | Corolla |
Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6392 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1458 kg | 940 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 55 L |