1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (202 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (111 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 192 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Fairlane | Megane |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6392 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1458 kg | 1650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 80 L |
