1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane.

Because 2007 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Ford Fairlane 2007 Mazda CX-9
Make Ford Mazda
Model Fairlane CX-9
Year Released 1967 2007
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3930 cc 3496 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 122 HP 263 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6250 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5110 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 76 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]