1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2008 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 217 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 2008 Mazda Etude | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fairlane | Etude |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3930 cc | 1839 cc |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1093 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |