1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2008 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2008 Nissan Almera is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Almera weights approximately 1095 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 2008 Nissan Almera | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Fairlane | Almera |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3930 cc | 1597 cc |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 2405 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |
