1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2009 BMW 316
To start off, 2009 BMW 316 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2009 BMW 316. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 29 kg more than 2009 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 2009 BMW 316 | |
| Make | Ford | BMW |
| Model | Fairlane | 316 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2730 mm |
