1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2009 Ford E-150
To start off, 2009 Ford E-150 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (202 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 486 kg more than 2009 Ford E-150.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 2009 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Fairlane | E-150 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6392 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1458 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 132 L |