1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (202 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford Fairlane | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Fairlane | Calais |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6392 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 344 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
