1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2010 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2010 Nissan GT-R is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan GT-R (485 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 363 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan GT-R weights approximately 420 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Nissan GT-R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 2010 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Fairlane | GT-R |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3930 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 485 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1372 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2779 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 74 L |