1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2010 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2010 Renault Trafic is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (141 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2010 Renault Trafic. (100 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Trafic.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Trafic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 2010 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Fairlane | Trafic |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3100 mm |