1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2011 Honda Fit
To start off, 2011 Honda Fit is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2011 Honda Fit. (117 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2011 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 181 kg more than 2011 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 2011 Honda Fit | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Fairlane | Fit |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3930 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 117 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1524 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2499 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 40 L |