1967 Ford Fairlane vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL (536 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 414 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 870 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford Fairlane | 2012 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Fairlane | CL |
Year Released | 1967 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3930 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 536 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1427 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2954 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 90 L |