1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1967 Ford GT 40 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Triumph Renown weights approximately 370 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Triumph Renown (147 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1952 Triumph Renown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford GT 40 | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | GT 40 | Renown |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 92 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2750 mm |
