1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 1956 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1967 Ford GT 40 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1956 Jeep CJ5. (135 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1956 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 182 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Because 1956 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1956 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford GT 40 | 1956 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | GT 40 | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1956 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3687 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2060 mm |
