1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 1965 Renault 4
To start off, 1967 Ford GT 40 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 317 more horse power than 1965 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 348 kg more than 1965 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford GT 40 | 1965 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | GT 40 | 4 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 60 L |
