1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500
To start off, 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 (95 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 has automatic transmission and 1967 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 1967 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford GT 40 | 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | GT 40 | Mum 500 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 500 cc |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 95 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |