1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 1997 Rover 414i
To start off, 1997 Rover 414i is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Rover 414i weights approximately 462 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Because 1967 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 414i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Rover 414i (167 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1997 Rover 414i will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford GT 40 | 1997 Rover 414i | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | GT 40 | 414i |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1460 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2780 mm |
