1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 2000 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2000 GMC Sierra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 865 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Sierra (353 Nm) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford GT 40 | 2000 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | Ford | GMC |
| Model | GT 40 | Sierra |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1775 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 3030 mm |
