1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 2000 Kia Joice

To start off, 2000 Kia Joice is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 2000 Kia Joice. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Joice. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Kia Joice weights approximately 387 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.

Because 1967 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Kia Joice, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Kia Joice (188 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2000 Kia Joice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Ford GT 40 2000 Kia Joice
Make Ford Kia
Model GT 40 Joice
Year Released 1967 2000
Body Type Coupe Minivan
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 1977 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 350 HP 135 HP
Engine RPM 7200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 85 Nm 188 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 998 kg 1385 kg
Vehicle Length 4300 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1050 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2730 mm