1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 907 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer (382 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford GT 40 | 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | GT 40 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 87.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 71 L |