1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 140 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 919 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford GT 40 | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | GT 40 | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 344 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 84 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1917 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 85 L |