1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (139 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 532 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (213 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander has automatic transmission and 1967 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 1967 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Ford GT 40 | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | GT 40 | Outlander |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 213 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 60 L |