1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 2008 Jeep Compass

To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Compass. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 831 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.

Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Compass (224 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Ford GT 40 2008 Jeep Compass
Make Ford Jeep
Model GT 40 Compass
Year Released 1967 2008
Body Type Coupe Crossover
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 2360 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 350 HP 173 HP
Engine RPM 7200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 85 Nm 224 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 998 kg 1829 kg
Vehicle Length 4300 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1050 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 125 L 51 L