1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 2008 Land Rover Discovery
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Discovery weights approximately 1710 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Because 2008 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Discovery (440 Nm) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Discovery will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford GT 40 | 2008 Land Rover Discovery | |
| Make | Ford | Land Rover |
| Model | GT 40 | Discovery |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2720 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 2708 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 82 L |
