1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 2008 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2008 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda DrifterX weights approximately 482 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda DrifterX (257 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda DrifterX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford GT 40 | 2008 Mazda DrifterX | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | GT 40 | DrifterX |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 257 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 80 L |
