1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 72 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Because 1967 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (148 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford GT 40 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | GT 40 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 50 L |
