1967 Ford GT 40 vs. 2009 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2009 Holden Caprice is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2009 Holden Caprice. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Caprice.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Ford GT 40. 2009 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1967 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 1967 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Ford GT 40 | 2009 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | GT 40 | Caprice |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
